Analysis of the guide “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose
A persons environment can affect him. In “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose a young mans life is held by twelve males with contrasing views. Eight a caring man, who needs to talk about why the opposite jurors think that the boy is guilty, clashes with Three, a sadistic man who would pull the swith himselfto end the boys life. Accroding to Rose, a quantity of parts can infulence a jury’s verdict, such as the emotional make-up of individual jurors.
Don’t waste time Get a verified expert to help you with Essay
Many parts can change a jurors determination. Juror Three, who’s convincd that the boy is guilty, is allied with Four who is eventually convicedEights showing of how the two testimonies given by the old lady and old man are lies, votes responsible. Three outraged by this exclames “A guilty man’s gonna be strolling the streets… he’s got to die! Stay with me.” (23) But Four sees the reality that Eight has brought into th gentle and nonetheless votes responsible.
Eight tries to persuade Three how the boy just isn’t responsible past cheap doubt but Three doesn’t pay attention adn would rather see the boy die.
“For this kid, you guess I’d pull the switch.”(17) This shows how emotionally unstable Three is. He is a grown man dwelling in a civilized neighborhood and would like to see a boy who he doesn’t even know die by his personal palms Eight does not think extremely of Three for what he says about killing the boy and shouts “your a sadist.
”(17) which is the absolute reality about Three. The emotional make-up of a juror can change his desicision on wther or not to let a person reside or die. When someone is requested judge someone else, shoud not you take a look at al the facts to make certain past a shoadow of a doubt that the person who cimmitted the crime is guilty? Yes, a juror ought to have a look at all of the details but some don’t, they only choose the person on how that individual feels.