A Solution to Gun Control
On December 12, 2012, twenty kids and 6 adults have been killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT. It was one of the deadliest school shootings in US history. The capturing renewed debate on the problem of gun management. It sparked a conflict between the Executive and Legislative branches over how greatest to take care of the scenario. Unfortunately, the gun debate tends to be a black or white issue – either you are “for guns” or “against guns”. There seems to be little center ground.
The media and politicians often play into the hype, making an enormous deal about which aspect people are on. There can be lot of cash at stake, as interest groups and lobbyists work exhausting to win supporters and stress politicians. These components have made it troublesome for anything to get down to help truly resolve the state of affairs. I do imagine that a compromise can be reached between either side, in order that constructive change can take place that can forestall future tragedies.
If you wish to learn more samples begin with these – Argumentative Essays.
Immediately after the Sandy Hook incident, the two sides have been out making their case. With the one aspect of gun management stating that this incident would have by no means occurred if there was more gun control, while the opposite aspect felt that tightening control legal guidelines would not have prevented nor will it cease something like this from occurring once more. Within hours of the taking pictures, President Obama made a television statement in which he stated, “we’re going to have to come back together and take significant action to stop more tragedies like this, whatever the politics”.
Then four days later at the memorial service in Connecticut, the President stated he would “use whatever power this workplace holds” to prevent related tragedies. On January 16, 2013, the President announced that he signed twenty-three government orders and was proposing twelve actions for Congress to cross to further gun control.
Congress additionally took some action on the issue and voted on two items of laws. On January 24, 2013, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 was launched within the Senate. Although passing the Senate Judiciary Committee, the invoice failed by a vote of 60 to forty. The other piece of legislation that was proposed during this time was common background checks. The Manchin-Toomey Amendment was put to a vote that may have required background checks on most firearms sales. On April 17, 2013, the Senate voted in opposition to this modification. In truth, the last main piece of gun management laws to make it into legislation was the assault weapons ban of 1994. Ironically, the ban was only momentary and expired in 2004. Repeated makes an attempt to renew it have failed. In spite of the increased and heightened emotion following the Sandy Hook incident, no extra gun management laws was made into legislation. This reality shows just how divided and how little room for compromise exists on the matter.
The individuals for and against gun management make up one most divided teams on a policy problem. The feelings they both have are strong and are deeply held. On the aspect for gun control, the argument is that if guns were harder to acquire, there would be less violent crimes being committed. One of the professional gun management facts is that greater than half of all murders in any given year are attributed to gun violence. With stricter laws, much less people would have entry to these weapons. Simply put, with no guns…no one may be killed with a gun. The anti gun management folks also have a compelling argument. They stand firmly behind the Second Amendment, which is the proper to bear arms. One of their statistics is that the USA has essentially the most closely armed civilian inhabitants by a big margin; however, we’re not even in the top 20 in our gun homicide victims. They say that guns usually are not the problem, the people are the problem.
They really feel it should not be tough or inconceivable for a law-abiding citizen to buy a rifle for looking season, or a pistol to guard their household. They really feel that gun control legal guidelines is not going to stop the mistaken people from acquiring weapons, so the problem just isn’t going to be solved by simply creating more gun control legal guidelines. With the tens of millions of people who live within the United States, it is an unimaginable request that everybody agree. Especially if our politicians proceed to solely propose “all or nothing” solutions. I imagine that there’s a answer to this drawback, and that extra must be accomplished to try to stop the senseless killing of harmless people. Although nothing is foolproof, we should attempt to do all we will to prevent another Sandy Hook. There is too much carnage and harm that somebody can do with the assault weapons and excessive capacity magazines obtainable right now. We already have many good federal and state laws on the books concerning weapons and gun management.
Unfortunately, they are not all being followed or correctly enforced. We ought to start there. One change I would make is to standardize gun registration throughout the nation. This is currently a state issue and every state has different requirements and procedures. Doing this may have many benefits. First, it will make it a lot simpler to observe and implement the laws already in place. By standardizing the procedure, you possibly can then more easily create a national database with this info, which may be accessed by every state. I believe this course of would assist to stop smuggling between states. In order to achieve the help of the pro gun group, this course of can not overshadow state legal guidelines on gun possession. Another possible solution I would make involves the design and manufacture of firearms. Gun manufactures have accomplished very little to make their products safer. I imagine we are in a position to stress gun manufactures, as we now have accomplished with different producers of consumer merchandise, to make their products safer and fewer more probably to discharge by chance.
An example of elevated security due to modifications in design and manufacturing is the auto. The technology at present exists that might instantly make weapons safer for the common public. There are security units that forestall unintended discharge. In addition, there are other devises that a gun owner could activate on a stolen gun that would render it utterly unusable. For some purpose, gun producers have been reluctant to market or to make these types of devises available. I believe these are two possible solutions that would break the gridlock and make a positive impact on this drawback. Gun management is among the most hotly debated social issues we are facing at present. Little has been carried out to resolve the issue due to the “all-or-nothing” legislative proposals which were introduced. The two solutions I’ve offered could be effective as a end result of they allow both teams to claim a victory. Neither group has to totally abandon its beliefs or cave to the opposite facet. This is a solution involving a compromise. This concern is so polarizing; I feel that little might be carried out if a solution involving a compromise can’t be reached. In any case, gun management issues will be around for long time.