Adult Attachment Styles and Romantic Relationships

In 1987, the Attachment Theory extended to incorporate the bonds between adults and their romantic partners; the extension includes the idea of the safe, the anxious-preoccupied, the dismissive-avoidant, and the fearful-avoidant attachment kinds. Current analysis, within the form of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, predicts adults exhibit attachment types through the forming, upkeep, and separation process.

Don’t waste time Get a verified expert to help you with Essay

The analysis utilized the experiences in shut relationships stock and the relationship maintenance questionnaire to find their conclusion. The findings concluded the affiliation among the adult attachment features like closeness, safe haven, and safe base develop over time in the course of the forming, upkeep, and separation course of. In addition, the conclusion show the effectiveness of each scientific and non scientific publicity therapies in the growth and preservation of the safe attachment style behaviors utilized in romantic relationships. Keywords: attachment kinds, romantic relationships, partners, adults, safe, insecure Adult Attachment Styles and Romantic Relationships

More than half of the world’s adults are involved in a romantic relationship. The most typical romantic relationship contains the sexual courting relationship, the domestic partnership, or the marriage.

The adults or companions involved in these relationships inevitably reach a point of conflict. How the connection partners react to the conflict shows whether the partners are appearing as a securely attached particular person or an insecurely hooked up individual. The securely connected grownup portrays a contented individual when coping with relationship points. Whereas, an insecurely attached grownup is an unhappy individual when dealing with relationship points. Adults ought to try for the safe attachment type for the most effective satisfaction level, commitment level, and skill to adapt to alter in their romantic relationship.


In 1952, John Bowlby originally designed the Attachment Theory to elucidate the bond between a baby and folks serving within the caregiver capacity (Feldman, 2011). Many theorists started noticing attachment influences the whole human expertise. In 1987, Cindy Hazan and Philip Shaver officially applied Bowlby’s views on attachment to include the bonds between adults and their romantic companions (Nudson-martin, 2012). Hazan and Shaver seen attachment in grownup romantic relationships as a powerful a part of an adult’s emotional life, and most of the most safe and insecure behaviors come up in the course of the maintenance of the romantic relationship. Hazan and Shaver seen the behavioral patterns between a child and its caregiver was just like the behavioral sample between an grownup and its romantic partner. Similarities like a need to be near the attachment determine and using the relationship as a secure haven to discover the world; consequently, Hazan and Shaver used Bowlby’s concept of attachment kinds to categorize the behavioral patterns adults display in different levels of their romantic relationships (Pittman, 2012). Hazan and Shaver developed four adult attachment kinds, safe and three insecure sorts. The grownup attachment types they developed are the secure, the anxious-preoccupied, the dismissive-avoidant, and the fearful-avoidant. The first attachment type is the safe kind which corresponds with the secure attachment style in kids.

The safe adult is warm a responsive of their interactions with their romantic relationship associate. Secure connected adults are inclined to have positive views of themselves, their companion, and their relationship. The securely hooked up grownup fells comfy with intimacy and independence. Their relationships are characterised by greater longevity, satisfaction, trust, commitment, and interdependence (Mikulincer *& Shaver, 2012) Secure adults tend to be extra glad of their relationships than insecure adults. The first insecure attachment type is the anxious-preoccupied, which corresponds to the anxious-ambivalent attachment type in children. The anxious-preoccupied grownup seeks excessive ranges of intimacy, approval, and responsiveness from their romantic relationship partner. The anxious-preoccupied adult values intimacy so much they become overly dependent on their relationship partners. They don’t worth themselves, and blame themselves for their partner’s lack of responsiveness. People who are anxious or preoccupied with attachment could exhibit high ranges of emotional expressiveness, fear, and impulsiveness of their relationships (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2012). The anxious-preoccupied particular person is clingy and has low self-worth. Low self worth and impulsiveness is likely to result in depression or suicide. The second insecure attachment type is the dismissive-avoidant, which corresponds to the avoidant attachment type in youngsters.

The dismissive-avoidant adult wishes a excessive level of independence from themselves and their relationship associate. They view themselves as self-sufficient, invulnerable to feelings related to being carefully attached to their companion, and close relationships as comparatively unimportant. The dismissive-avoidant grownup tends to avoid intimacy because their partner is much less necessary. An grownup with a dismissive-avoidant attachment fashion tends to suppress and conceal their feelings (Juhl, Sands, & Routledge, 2012). The dismissive-avoidant style is attribute of young male adults in the dating stage (Poulsen, Holman, Busby, & Carroll, 2013); the young male experiences the dearth of responsiveness and the carelessness of other’s feelings. The dismissive-avoidant grownup lacks responsiveness and is an ego-maniac. Being, an ego-maniac is more probably to lead to dissatisfaction with everyone else. The third insecure attachment fashion is the fearful-avoidant, which also corresponds to the avoidant attachment type in children.

The fearful-avoidant grownup often has skilled some sort of emotional or physical abuse, and in turn do not belief their romantic relationship companions. The fearful-avoidant grownup experiences mixed emotions. On one hand, they need to have emotionally close relationships. On the opposite hand, they have a tendency to feel uncomfortable with emotional closeness. These combined emotions are mixed with, an unconscious view of themselves as unworthy of responsiveness and trust from their partner, and the reverse is true (Juhl et al, 2012). The fearful-avoidant attachment style can additionally be typical of the adults in the remarriage stage (Ehrenberg, Roberts & Pringle, 2012); the divorcee experiences the mixed emotions and the shortage of trust. A mix of the opposite two insecure attachment types, the fearful-avoidant grownup has low self esteem and lacks responsiveness. Discussion

The secure, anxious-preoccupied, dismissive-avoidant and fearful-avoidant attachment styles share each commonalities and differences. The problem of needing a romantic relationship is common within the safe, anxious-preoccupied, and sometimes within the fearful-avoidant attachment kinds, this that means these attachment kinds lend toward satisfaction in romantic relationships. While the dismissive-avoidant connected grownup does not have the identical emotions. Also, the need to be in a relationship results in the adult wanting to commit and faces; the adults desires to be in a relationship no matter what happens sooner or later. The problem of having low self esteem is a standard problem in the anxious –preoccupied and fearful-avoidant attachment styles. The low self-worth arises when the adult feels there are unworthy of their partner’s intimacy. Due to this fact, the adults displaying these kinds are much less sociable. In this case, the adults with low self esteem have low satisfaction with themselves, which in flip leads to low satisfaction in their romantic relationship. The low self-worth adult can not fully commit, and cannot endure changes. Their own points result in them not trusting the dedication and modifications displayed by their associate. Additionally, there are commonalities in the problem of responsiveness or responding to the companion after they really feel anxiety. The responsiveness issues are a half of all the attachment kinds, nevertheless responsiveness can range from zero percent to 100%.

The zero % is the dismissive-avoidant attachment style, and the 100% is the secure attachment type. The lack of responsiveness results in the adult not caring concerning the end result or commitment degree of the romantic relationship. In addition, the adult that lacks responsiveness does not care in regards to the adjustments that are likely to come up. A way for researchers to search out an adult’s want to be in a relationship, self esteem, and responsiveness is the strange scenario. The unusual state of affairs is an observational approach to gauge the companions attachment fashion (Selcuk, Zayas, & Hazan, 2010). The unusual scenario appears on the secure base and the secure haven. The companion and the connection are the safe base and protected haven, respectively. The strange situation method may also be used to alter an insecure adult to a secure adult, once they are aware of their attachment fashion. Adults who appear secure within the strange state of affairs, for example, are inclined to have a companion who is aware of them. On the opposite hand, adults that show one of the insecure attachment types in the unusual state of affairs has a associate who’s insensitive to their needs, or inconsistent or rejecting within the love they provide (Edenfield, Adams, & Briihl, 2012). Essentially through the unusual situation, the grownup asks themselves the next elementary query: Is the associate close by, accessible, and attentive? If the answer is “yes,” she or he feels liked, safe, and assured.

Behaviorally, the grownup is likely to leave their secure base and be sociable with their partner and others. However, the answer is “no,” the grownup experiences anxiousness, visual searching , energetic following, and vocal signaling .These behaviors continue till both the grownup is in a position to reestablish a desirable stage of bodily or psychological proximity to the partner , or till the adult whines down. The nervousness conduct displayed is much like those skilled during separation or loss (Heffernan, Fraley, Vickary & Brumbaugh, 2012). Similar questioning to the strange situation is asked in the experiences in close relationships inventory (ECR), and the relationship upkeep questionnaire (RM). Questions concerning the desire to be in a romantic relationship, and the likely behaviors displayed in that relationship marks the inventory and questionnaire) Edenfield et al, 2012). The ECR and the RM can be utilized to predict whether or not the connection companion is securely connected or insecurely connected.

The analysis findings from the strange scenario, the ECR, and the RM combined with the discovering closeness, secure haven, and safe base occur over time developed efficient clinical and non clinical exposure treatments. In this case, the insecurely connected adult can choose to be handled in a clinic or in the home near the secure haven. In both case using adaptive abilities will be utilized. Additionally, utilizing adaptive expertise will transfer an insecurely connected adult to and securely attached grownup. Adaptive skills are skills a romantic partner makes use of in response to their partner’s behaviors. Adaptive abilities promote emotionally available and appropriately responsive partners, in addition to a partner capable of regulating each his and her constructive and unfavorable emotions (Feldman, 2011). The insecurely attach grownup will utilize adaptive abilities to counter act the opposite partner’s insecure behavior, in a approach to exhibit safe attachment. Conclusion and future directions

In conclusion, most adults are in a romantic relationship, and behave and react within the relationship. Due to this reality, the grownup gains either secure or insecure attachment to their romantic companion. The securely hooked up grownup is warm and conscious of the ideals of dedication and their capability to adapt well to changes they’ll face in a romantic relationship. Additionally, the securely connected individual displays increased levels of satisfaction of their romantic relationship. Romantic relationships having one or both partners exhibiting insecure attachment style, will find moving to a safe attachment useful to their romantic relationship. Especially, within the areas of satisfaction, commitment, and the totally different adjustments. The insecurely attached companions will find using adaptive abilities in both medical and non clinical publicity therapies useful in growing a safe attachment. The most helpful is experiencing long-tern exposure to the safe attachment type within the home. In the longer term, the idea can be utilized to the world of work and higher education. Adults experience long term relationships with colleagues and professors.


Edenfield, J. L., Adams, K. S., & Briihl, D. S. (2012) Relationship Maintenance Strategy Used by Romantic Attachment fashion. North American Journal of Psychology, 14)1), pp 149. Retrieved from, Ehrenberg, M. F., Roberts, M., & Pringle, J. (2012). Attachment Style and Marital Commitment in the Context of Remarriage. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 53(3), pp 204-219. doi: 10. 1080/10502556.2012.663270 Feldman, R. S. (2011). Development throughout the Lifespan. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: McGraw-Hill. Heffernan, M. E., Fraley, R. C., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2012). Attachment Features and Functions in Adult Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(5), pp 671-693. doi: 10.1177/0265407512443435 Juhl, J., Sand, E. C., & Routledge, C. (2012). the Effects of Nostalgia and Avoidant Attachment on Relationship Satisfaction and Relationship Motives. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(5), pp 661-670. doi: 10.1177/0265407512443433 Mikulincer, M & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Adult Attachment Orientations and Relationship Processes. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 4(4), pp 259-274. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1756-2589.2012.00142.x Nudson-Martin, C. (2012). Attachment in Adult Relationships: a Feminist Perspective. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 4(4), pp. 299-305. doi: 10. 1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00141.x Pittman, J. F. (2012). Attachment Orientations: A Boon to Family Theory and Review. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 4(4), pp 306-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00133.x Poulsen, F. O., Holman, T. B., Busby, D. M., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Physical Attraction, Attachment Styles, and Dating Development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), pp
301-319. doi: 10.1177/0265407512456673 Selcuk, E., Zayas, V.., & Hazan, C. (2010). Marital Satisfaction: The Role of Attachment in Marital Function. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2(4), pp 258-259. doi: 10. 1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00061.x