American Airlines Case Study

Executive Summary

With 1988 operating income of $801 million on a revenue of $8.55 billion, American Airlines, Inc. (American), principal subsidiary of Dallas/Fort Worth-based AMR Corporation, was the most important airline within the United States. At year-end 1988 American operated 468 aircraft on 2,200 flights every day to 151 destinations within the United States, Bermuda, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, France, Great Britain, Japan, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Spain, Switzerland, Venezuela, and West Germany. The objective of American Airlines income management effort was to maximize passenger revenues by selling the proper seats to the best clients at the proper costs.

As the choice maker of American Airlines, I advocate introducing Upgraded Computerized Reservation System to switch present SABRE system to maintain the corporate leader of the business while maximizing profit.

Part 2: Issues Identification

Immediate Issue

Low load components for Chicago – West Coast
Nature: tactic Timing: short time period In 1987, in the nonstop markets, American and United competed on the premise of fares, flight schedules, and elements similar to high quality of service. In the connecting markets, American, United, and Continental additionally competed on the basis of fares and flight schedules.

Once again American and United matched each other’s fares, whereas Continental, with its post-Chapter 11 reorganization and low-cost structure, was the low-price supplier. So, United had a superior flight schedule, and Continental cheaper fares. As for American, our load factors had been right down to an unacceptable level.

Deep low cost for New York – San Juan

Nature: tactic Timing: brief term New York-San Juan was American’s largest market, measured in income passenger miles. The market was fairly evenly divided into three categories.

The first category consisted of business passengers; enterprise travel occurred year-round. Leisure passengers made up the second class; leisure travel peaked in the summer. Passengers of Caribbean origin either coming to the United States or returning to the Caribbean to go to friends and family members constituted the third class. Eastern periodically supplied deep discounts to stimulate demand throughout traditional sluggish seasons. In September 1988 Eastern introduced a restricted round-trip fare of $198 midweek and $238 weekend. The fare was relevant for travel until December 14, 1988. American needed to determine if and how to respond.

Systemic Issue

Complicity of Yield Management

Nature: Strategic Timing: long term American Airlines broadly described the function of yield administration as “selling the proper seats to the right clients on the right prices.” At American Airlines, nearly every little thing is automated as a end result of the yield-management decision-making process is merely too massive and therefore too advanced to be processed manually.

Part three: Environmental & Root Cause Analysis

In the past, under regulations, airways were not allowed to set their ticket prices at will. Rather, all fares needed to be approved by the government. Normally, fares have been set on a value plus basis so as to assure airlines a minimum return. On the one hand, airlines had no incentive to reduce costs by streaming operations and growing productiveness. Essentially, value discrimination underneath regulation was primarily based on the belief of two distinct and simply separable forms of clients: price-insensitive, but very time-sensitive enterprise vacationers, normally flying on expenses, and worth sensitive, yet-time-insensitive leisure vacationers, sometimes paying for their own journeys.

The deregulation of the airline industry has opened up many alternatives to seize market share and revenues. American must identify and develop an in depth income administration and yield administration plan to capitalize on this opportunity. Airline deregulation in 1979 led to further complexity in the apply of yield administration. Two major changes took place.

First, the number and number of low cost fares elevated. Second, airline started offering connecting service, using centrally located airports as hubs, to serve extra of the traveling public and supply national service. The resulting airline surroundings could be very complex. The following components difficult the yield administration task: (1) the demand for full- and discount-fare seats on any given flight was unsure; (2) the demand was variable over time;

(3) in sure cases, for instance leisure flights, the demand was additionally “lumpy”; (4) there was a bewildering multitude of fare types and restrictions; (5) the hub-and-spoke system made some customers in one fare type extra engaging than other prospects in the identical fare type; (6) some clients booked seats but did not present up for their flights.

Part 4: Alternatives and Options
Below is a detailed breakdown of the alternatives and choices for the problems identified above.

Option 1: Marketing
American Airlines may focus its priorities on marketing so as to understand its full potential from a demand, capacity and yield perspective. Offering last minute vacation packages or more aggressive pricing insurance policies for flights that look more and more like they gained’t reach capacity would be one other way to help fill vacant spots.

Pros:

a. To sell deeply discounted seats at the last minute might make extra profit. b. American Airlines could possibly be identified to supply incredible last minute holidays periodically.

Cons:
a. Focusing solely on advertising in an business that is present process rapid change could probably be extremely costly in the lengthy term. b. Marketing would offer quick time period advantages however concrete improvements by different airways could depart American behind. c. Another downside to an aggressive marketing focus is would skew yield administration regression models, most notably overbooking.

Option 2: Upgrade Computerized Reservation System

American Airlines’ “store front” is the computerized reservations system, SABRE (semi-automated enterprise analysis environment). All sale and cancellation transactions, whether from American Airlines reservations brokers or travel brokers, move through SABRE, updating reservations stock for all affected flights. Because the yield administration decision-making course of is so giant and sophisticated at American Airlines, effective management of the stock of seats can be accomplished solely with extra superior automated fashions.

Pros:

a. Increase the productiveness of yield-management specialists and the discount in work load can permit them to spend extra time reviewing solely crucial flights thus making better income selections. b. Instead of being a price follower, the system may information the company make higher pricing methods. c. Keep American Airlines leader place in the industry.

[newline]

Cons:
a. It takes time and capital funding of new system.
b. There is a learning curve for brand new system and takes time to get used to new system.

Part 5: Recommendations

Critical to an airline’s operation is the efficient use of its reservations stock. American Airlines currently has essentially the most superior computerized reservations system – SABRE. To improve the responsiveness and effectiveness of yield-management methods and to coordinate reservations stock determination with SABRE, it is suggested that option 2 is applied. Because the yield-management decision-making course of is so large and complex at American Airlines, efficient control of the inventory of seats may be accomplished only with more advanced automated models. The new model is aiming at dealing with overbooking management, discount allocation and visitors administration.

Part 6: Implementation Plan

Step 1: Acquire buy-in from stake holders and administration.
Step 2: Set up target and create budget.
Step three: Establish a staff to do the development of recent system.

Part 7: Monitor and Control

Yield administration performance is troublesome to measure due to the dynamic nature of the marketplace. Decision Technologies developed a reliable and credible methodology of measuring performance that we consider is unique within the airline trade. In order to gauge the success of implementing this course of sure KPIs need to be established to compare towards earlier system: Load factor

Revenue yield per passenger mile
Operating expense per out there passenger seat mile