An Analysis of “The Klan”s Fight for Americanism”

In 1926, Hiram Wesley Evans, then Imperial Wizard and Emperor of the Ku Klux Klan, revealed “The Klan’s Fight for Americanism”, a leaflet that set forth the principles and fundamentals of what many called the revival of the KKK in 1920’s America, a brand new version of the organization that was originally fashioned by Nathan Bedford Forrest after the Civil War in an effort to hold up the supremacy of the white man over the just lately freed African-American slaves. The researcher will analyze and discuss Evans’ writing in this paper from the standpoint of his views and specific tenets to be found within “The Klan’s Fight for Americanism”.

Don’t waste time Get a verified expert to help you with Essay

In addition, the researcher will present views as as to if or not Evans’ views agree with those of the researcher, and finally, a response to Evans’ view might be offered. Upon the conclusion of this paper, the reader could have a thorough understanding of Evans’ work in addition to some potential various viewpoints on it.

A Brief Overview of “The Klan’s Fight for Americanism” In order to completely understand the assorted elements of Evans’ writing, and to adequately interpret it, a brief overview of the work itself is in order.

The previously talked about revival of the KKK in the early 1920’s got here in response to what the group called the “infestation by aliens” of America within the years instantly following World War I. As a results of the KKK’s revival, by 1926, the organization had over three million members. The KKK increased its record of those whom it hated to incorporate Jews, Catholics, Communists, and those that had been members of the labor unions that have been gaining reputation in America throughout that point.

Hiram W.

Evans, upon assuming control of the KKK in 1926, wrote “The Klan’s Fight for Americanism” as a means to lay the groundwork for what would be a new growth of the Ku Klux Klan within the 20th century. Americanism as Defined by Evans One of the key phrases that Evans makes use of in his writing is the term Americanism, one thing that he claims is a trademark of the KKK. The term Americanism on this context has its roots in patriotism, something that the KKK claims to have in abundance; nevertheless, the interpretation of patriotism that the KKK has varied greatly from what one would normally find in the perception methods of somebody like Abraham Lincoln, for example.

Patriotism, because the cornerstone of Americanism, on this case has some far reaching implications. First, consider the KKK’s definition of the American ideal within Americanism, which can first be introduced by use of an precise quote from Evans’ work: “Americanism, to the Klansman, is a factor of the spirit, a purpose and a viewpoint, that can only come through instinctive racial understanding. It has, to make sure, certain defined rules, but he does not consider that many aliens understand these principles, even once they use our words in talking about them. . .

.In short, the Klansman believes in the best possible variety and individualism throughout the limits of the American spirit. But he believes also that few aliens can understand that spirit, that fewer attempt to, and that there have to be resistance, intolerance even, toward something that threatens it, or the fundamental nationwide unity based upon It” (Evans, 1926) . What Americanism is, for the Klansman, is the concept of liberty and justice for all, as Americans recites in their Pledge of Allegiance, but “all” has its limits alongside racial, ethnic and non secular boundaries.

For the KKK, coming proper from the pen of its chief at the time, the American Dream was obtainable for those who qualified by being a certain race, nationality or faith, embodied within the KKK credo of “native, white, Protestant supremacy” (Evans, 1926). Using terms like “mongrelization” to explain the ethnic diversity that America was experiencing largely as a end result of displacement of Europeans after World War I, Evans set up unlimited possibilities for a limited few, not much totally different from the slavery that America utilized prior to the Civil War. Another factor of Evans philosophy was what he defined as “The American Race”.

This race encompasses people who are white descendants from the traditional Nordic tribes of Europe, Protestant in faith. Evans makes a specific non secular distinction, saying that “Rome shall not rule America”, which means that the Roman Catholic Church, and more specifically the Pope, will not have any hold on what “The American Race” does in the United States (Evans, 1926). A Response to Evans’ View While Hiram W. Evans, as an American citizen, has the right to specific his opinions and views, likewise it’s applicable for the researcher to answer what Evans wrote and professed in “The Klan’s Fight for Americanism”.

As a response, rather than embarking on a protracted tirade of random responses, his work shall be mentioned alongside the traces of carefully chosen main points, which will give a better response to the general work. Those key points are as follows: • DIVERSITY IS THE BASIS OF AMERICAN GREATNESS- No one can debate that the many contributions made to America in terms of the arts, sciences, humanities, training and extra would not have been very vital had been it not for these of many different ethnic backgrounds who came to America seeking a better life and finally made America a better place for others.

If America had been only open to Evans’ “American Race”, the nation likely would have been held back from its full potential. • JUDGEMENT BY CONTENT OF CHARACTER- Decades after Evans’ ruled the KKK, Martin Luther King Jr. professed that he dreamed of an America the place folks could be judged not by the color of pores and skin, however my content of character. By limiting his view of Americans to be only those of the white race, Evans excluded many fantastic people from inclusion in the American Dream.

This exclusivity again would have compromised the ability of America to develop and thrive as it has. • ONE NATION UNDER GOD HAS MANY MEANINGS- The perception in God cannot, and shouldn’t be out there solely to these of the Protestant religion that Evans advocates in his teachings and writings. A nation built on many religions can present a powerful ethical foundation and certainly has in the case of America.

Aside from whether or not an individual’s belief in God comes from the Protestant, Catholic, Jewish or any of a quantity of other theologies, the teachings of respect for different individuals, peace, integrity and morality has helped to make America nice. Agreement With Evans? The researcher has clearly shown that there’s definite disagreement with Evans and the content of “The Klan’s Fight for Americanism”. Having the benefit of viewing the publication in hindsight, it’s clearly seen that the American panorama would be vastly totally different within the 21st century if Evans ruled the 20th.

Closing Thoughts It was once stated that those who do not be taught from historical past are condemned to repeat it. In the case of Evans’ teachings and writings, that is undoubtedly true. Luckily, the hatred that he professed has not completely dominated the American culture, however does exist at present. Therefore, it’s important for each American to concentrate to the past to keep away from pitfalls in the future.


Evans, Hiram W. (1926). The Klan’s Fight for Americanism. North American Review, 223, 38-39.

Written by Essay Examples

An Application of Jean Watson’s Theory of Transpersonal Caring to Nursing Practice

An Analysis of “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”