Animal testing shouldn’t be banned

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

10 December 2021

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Get custom essay

97 writers online

For a few years, animals have been utilized in research both within the scientific and medical fields. In order to introduce new drugs into the market, they have to be tested first on animals in order to confirm whether or not they’re effective or not. Animal experimentation in this context defines using non-humans, mostly animals, to check new medicine and client goods similar to cosmetics, pesticides, herbicides, meals additives, among others (Taylor 120). Pharmaceutical corporations and research establishments have been lively in animal experiments as a outcome of these establishments are charged with arising with new drugs.

What has nevertheless been controversial with animal experiments is whether this procedure should be banned or not based mostly on its ethical implications. Animal rights activists have been on the forefront in advocating for a ban on animal experiments primarily based on the moral points related to it. For these supporting using animals in experiments, the arguments which were made embrace potentialities of medical and scientific breakthroughs, security for people, and accuracy of results.

Researching about animal testing in argumentative essays.

When the benefits of animal experimentation are weighed towards the drawbacks, it is evident that the process is helpful. Accordingly, animal experimentation shouldn’t be banned. First, animal experiments should not be banned based mostly on the truth that it has been beneficial to humans and animals. With the recent technological development, substantive accomplishment has been made within the field of human medication and science. In this regard, the usage of animal testing can’t be underestimated.

Taylor (132) maintains that animal experimentation has helped in unearthing new medicine that have helped to ease the suffering of humans from disease that was once witnessed up to now. Blakemore assist Taylors level by indicating that vaccines for polio and cervical most cancers, insulin, antibiotics, heart-bypass surgery, amongst others have been all advances that have been achieved by way of animal testing. For a patient to receive therapy or remedy, it must be known that this originated from an arduous medical analysis involving animals.

For occasion, Blakemore makes use of an instance of how people can easily neglect the importance of animals in medical research. This is based on the truth that powerful drugs similar to Avastin used to treat bowel, breast, and lung most cancers have been developed after analysis was conducted on mice. John Stein, the professor of Oxford Functional Neurosurgery Group additionally helps animal experiments as a outcome of it helps to enhance medicines and treatments (Campbell). Some nations like the UK have even realized the benefits of animal testing in advancing the medical field (University of Bradford). However, UK has banned using animal testing for client goods such as for cosmetics manufacturing (University of Bradford). Critics have nonetheless been instrumental in indicating numerous moral implications linked with animal testing. As the critics point out, animal testing is a procedure that doesn’t take into consideration the rights of animals.

As a matter of reality, animals are identical to humans who require to be treated the way humans are handled. While supporting animal research, Taylor (120) nevertheless cites some commentators who argue that the experiment that concerned testing cosmetics and other hazardous products on rabbits in order to know the way long the rabbits would die was unethical. This experiment fundamentally was meant to check the extent of toxicity of sure substances. As Taylor (128) echoes the sentiments of critics, this is an inhumane means of treating animals because “… the struggling of any being should count equally with the like struggling of any other being.” These among different crucial arguments have formed the basis of the opposing facet of animal testing. It could also be justified to talk in phrases of animal ethics when there is justification that animals have really been mistreated. Considering that few cases have been reported relating to inhumane therapy of animals, it shouldn’t nevertheless justify the lifting of a ban on animal testing. As a matter of truth, animals have helped a great deal within the scientific and medical field which has equally improved the quality of human life.

From a practical perspective, using animal experiments ensures the security of people. In order to ascertain whether or not drugs and different client goods are protected for humans, the usage of animals becomes justified. Taylor (132) even helps this idea by indicating that very few animals are sacrificed throughout such experiments which assist to not solely save tens of millions of people, but in addition animals. Opponents of this claim have however cited instances of animal struggling and deaths because of ineffective experimental procedures. Taylor (120) highlights a important perspective regarding this problem by indicating that “Of course, Jennie was not human; she was a squirrel monkey. To do such a analysis on a human being would be immoral. The query then is, what justifies using a monkey?” Other commentators have also indicated the idea of injecting animals with toxins within the name of scientific development.

Although these arguments might seem believable, it’s nonetheless essential to notice that humans are practically extra essential than animals. It would thus be justified to claim that animal testing shouldn’t be banned. It has additionally been found that technological development has enabled outcomes from animal testing to be more correct with minimal harm inflicted on animals. Blakemore highlights the biological relationship that humans have with animals. According to the creator, chimpanzees and a few rodents like mice and rats share related genes with people. The method these animals reply to illness remedies is just the same as people. Because there is no other different to check the effectiveness of medication and consumer goods, the use of animals in experiments becomes justified. Blakemore reiterates that there are numerous incurable illnesses such as Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, and a quantity of sclerosis which require quick analysis to be able to find new treatment.

Because researchers and scientists have the power to attain this objective, they need to use every tool available at their disposal so as to make sure that cures for such diseases are found. Critics of this argument have nonetheless maintained their stand relating to the futility of such efforts. As critics declare, some medication have not been as effective as claimed. Indeed, a few of the consumer merchandise and medicines have needed to be recalled because of ineffective experimental procedures which resulted in medicine not serving their supposed functions. It may be justified to conform to this assertion considering that animal experiments are products of human making which are subject to errors and flaws. However, with the latest advancement in know-how, such cases have turn out to be rare.

Taylor (134-136) posits that there are new strategies similar to pc simulation which permits present information and information for use by researchers and scientists to further enhance on what had earlier been done. Banning animal testing would in this case quantity to deteriorating well being standards of people inside societies. Definitely, animal testing has been a controversial problem considering that there are moral implications related to it. While this might be true, the advantages of this process nevertheless outweigh the drawbacks.

For those who desire a ban on animal testing to be lifted, the process just isn’t moral however only serves to infringe on the rights of animals. The arguments made by critics however are shortsighted as a outcome of history clearly indicates that the medication that individuals are utilizing these days got here on account of animal testing. Fundamentally, animal testing shouldn’t be banned as a outcome of there are prospects of future cures being unearthed, the procedure is secure for people, and the outcomes have been more exact.

– roughly 5 billion animals are consumed as meals annually – compared to that, only 17-22 million animals are used for in research annually – anesthesia is used today to numb the body throughout operations because it was successfully tested on animals => 6 % of animals do nonetheless expertise pain, however this has to do with the analysis itself – the alleviation of ache would compromise the outcomes => 61 % of animals used suffer no pain

=> 31 % of animals have ache relieved with anesthesia
– AIDs analysis depends heavily on animal testing; different testing techniques aren’t optimized yet stem cells (SC) are a relative new way to carry out testing. This will decrease the use of animals in the testing process. Furthermore, SC can show a specific organ’s response to a substance. The housing of the animals, feeding, carrying, therapies, controlling the surroundings, is very expensive oFinding medication and coverings to enhance health and medicine. There are already some lifesaving medical breakthroughs that are the results of animal testing, like open coronary heart surgical procedure, organ transplants, efficient insulin, vaccines for lethal ailments, …

It is essentially the most accurate method to study the results of drugs in a living body

Ensuring the protection of medication and other substances

Human hurt is lowered and human lives are saved but also animal lives are saved due to animal testing.

Many of the medications and procedures that we currently use today wouldn’t exist and the event of future therapies can be extremely limited.

Many argue that the lives of animals could additionally be worthy of some respect, however the worth we give on their lives does not rely as a lot as the worth we give to human life.

Using cell cultures can solely reveal side effects on a molecular level and can’t sadly, reveal side effects like organ failure, rashes, tumors, or cardiac arrest like animal testing can.

Using laptop models can’t all the time predict unknown variables that can be found with animal testing.

Animals might not have the very same philology as people but animal testing is correct enough to test whether or not a substance is even safe enough for human trials.

Experiments should only happen if there is no different methodology that doesn’t entail the utilization of animals. Animals concerned have to be these with the lowest diploma of neuro-physiological sensitivity”.

Cite this page

Animal testing shouldn’t be banned. (10 December 2021). Retrieved from

"Animal testing shouldn’t be banned" StudyScroll, 10 December 2021,

StudyScroll. (2021). Animal testing shouldn’t be banned [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 5 December, 2023]

"Animal testing shouldn’t be banned" StudyScroll, Dec 10, 2021. Accessed Dec 5, 2023.

"Animal testing shouldn’t be banned" StudyScroll, Dec 10, 2021.

"Animal testing shouldn’t be banned" StudyScroll, 10-Dec-2021. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 5-Dec-2023]

StudyScroll. (2021). Animal testing shouldn’t be banned. [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 5-Dec-2023]

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay..

get custom paper

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.