Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.

19 December 2021

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Get custom essay

96 writers online

Critical thinkers apply three completely different ideas when making use of ethics to decision making. Set priorities, try to search out further options and options, and negotiate choices totally aimed or partially reaching an important interest of all involved events (Peter A. Facione). Considering our values, rights, and consequences we will assume abortion is and could be different in accordance with one’s view or the view of others in the matter. After much analysis I want I might say I have decided whether I think abortion is ok, however I am still on the fence in regards to the topic.

I plan to do extra research on this subject and ask people who have experienced making the choice whether or not to abort their baby.

Consequence-based ethical reasoning entails figuring out whether an action is right or wrong in accordance with its penalties. If a certain action will result in a great consequence, then it’s the proper factor to do; if it results in a foul consequence, it’s the incorrect factor to do.

Those could be the overriding common principles. Of course, to use this method, one must define “good consequence” and “bad consequence.” A common definition raises concepts of ache and pleasure, each largely defined to incorporate more than just bodily pains and pleasures. Other possible standards of goodness embrace the concepts of happiness, well-being, and benefit. Take into consideration the bodily and psychological trauma for girls related to abortion. “Which act will lead to the best penalties (Group.

)? If abortion heartens medical and phycological problems is it ethical? Take the case of child Jane Doe for instance. The case was a medical dispute on the proper care of severely handicapped kids. A four-month-old toddler from New York with extreme medical points and her dad and mom choose not to treat the child for the said child’s greatest curiosity. That treating her and doing surgery would solely delay her struggling in her short life expectancy (Gary E. McCuen).

Would it have been better to have aborted baby Jane earlier than she was born with medical disabilities? The youngster was not able to speak for herself. Did the parents do this to end her struggling, or end their very own monetary accountability in addition to caring for a handicapped child? Does each human life have the same dollar amount (Peter A. Facione)? Utilitarianism, a scientific method to ethical reasoning that defines morally proper acts as those which result in the biggest good for the best number of all concerned.

Utilitarianism is doubtless one of the most powerful and persuasive approaches to normative ethics within the historical past of philosophy. A consequence-based approach is that intent is irrelevant. The consequence-based reasoning is that “the end justifies the means” it doesn’t matter how you deliver a couple of good consequence, solely that the consequence is indeed good. Can we actually justify the willful destruction of human embryos by arguing that “the end justifies the means” (Group.)? Is it acceptable to undermine the dignity of human life in the name of medical progress (Torr)? So, if utilizing an embryo for stem cell research will help us fight disease in the future or help couples have kids with no disabilities make utilizing embryos ethical? Is an embryo considered a life (Torr)? Purely in terms of consequence to that individual, there is no method to put greater worth on the one than on the other (Peter A. Facione).

Rights-based moral reasoning involves figuring out whether an action is right or mistaken in accordance with whose and which rights are upheld or violated by the act in query. Such rights would possibly include the proper to free speech, the proper to own property, the best to vote, the best to be free from harm, the proper to go wherever you want, and so forth. In this case, the overall ideas would be something like “One should respect the best of others too. . .” or “This motion is incorrect as a outcome of it violates this person’s proper to . . .” I suppose children have a proper to a contented and healthy childhood. How can a have such rights if aborted? When taking a rights-based approach to moral decisions, one must first determine what rights are concerned (Group.). In the Nineteen Sixties, there was no federal law regulating abortions, and a lot of states had banned the practice completely, besides when the lifetime of the mom was endangered. Abortion highlights the issue when it comes to pro-life arguments and pro-choice arguments ( Did you understand Pope John Paul II is a pacesetter within the pro-life movement? During his landmark 1998 visit to Cuba, he criticized the island’s legalized abortion policies ( The Roe v.

Wade case acknowledged the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her personal personal medical choices, including the decision to have an abortion with out interference from officers ( “Morality depends on your religion” or, “God tells you what to do.” Those who imagine life begins at conception really feel that the unborn youngster deserves the same authorized protections as an grownup. Ending such a life is equal to murder to those who subscribe to this belief (Group.). Others argue that life begins at delivery and that laws proscribing abortion interfere with the best of a lady to resolve what’s in her own best pursuits. ( Religious duty, who appointed you God? Who gave you the proper to play God? Some folks appeal to religion as the basis for his or her values. Alternatively, some people suggest that our rights are God-given.

This reply, in fact, does not satisfy those that don’t assume there’s a god. But even for many who do, it’s a bit problematic: how are you aware which rights this god has given you? “The choice of whether or not to abort or not is mine and mine alone. I have the proper to say what occurs in my body! “And what about me? I’m the father! Don’t I have any rights? And that child-to-be? Doesn’t it have any rights?” “The flight from the grey”: people can’t perceive something in the easy phrases of black and white, so that they faux it doesn’t exist or isn’t important. After all, doing that’s a lot simpler than entering the gray space, getting lost, getting confused, and getting annoyed with complexity and uncertainty (Group.). It is always easy troublesome for anyone to offer due consideration to alternative views and beliefs (Peter A. Facione).

Values-based ethical reasoning includes determining whether or not an action is true or incorrect based on whether or not or not the action in question adapts to sure values, such as truthfulness, duty, justice, temperance, braveness, self-control, knowledge, equity, pride, ambition, gentleness, frankness, self-interest, faithfulness, gratitude, compassion, self-improvement, non-maleficence, reparation, care, compassion, sensitivity, reciprocity, generosity, modesty, kindness, respect, patriotism, prejudice, equality, and so on (Group.).

Evaluating arguments about ethical issues is not any different from evaluating other sorts of arguments. if you finish up offered with an argument about an moral issue, undergo the identical steps: identify the difficulty, identify the purpose, and establish the premises supporting that time (both those explicitly acknowledged and people assumed); then evaluate the premises, considering whether or not they’re true or acceptable, whether or not or not they’re related, and whether or not they’re sufficient to help the declare. Then resolve whether or not the argument is robust sufficient for you to settle for its conclusion, usually a judgment about whether something is right or mistaken (Group.).

Is it right to abort a baby following all the premises? The best method to protect folks from wrongdoing is to make the wrongdoing illegal? Ethics refers to a set of behavioral ideals or moral principles that guide us in determining right and wrong (Peter A. Facione). Some individuals imagine abortion is a crime, and others think about it to be the free selection of the person. If we apply important thinking and ethics after we determine on abortion does it make us assume abortion is ok?

Cite this page

Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion. (19 December 2021). Retrieved from

"Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion" StudyScroll, 19 December 2021,

StudyScroll. (2021). Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 9 August, 2022]

"Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion" StudyScroll, Dec 19, 2021. Accessed Aug 9, 2022.

"Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion" StudyScroll, Dec 19, 2021.

"Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion" StudyScroll, 19-Dec-2021. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 9-Aug-2022]

StudyScroll. (2021). Applying Critical Thinking Skills to Ethics in Abortion. [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 9-Aug-2022]

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay..

get custom paper

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.