in

Are Gertrude and Ophelia merely pawns in the world of Hamlet?

‘Are Gertrude and Ophelia merely pawns on the earth of Hamlet? Explore the performs illustration of femininity, paying close consideration to the function and function of each of those two characters in the play’. William Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ may be seen as a chess game purchased to life. The play depicts the events in a 16th century Danish royal family that unfold after a suspicious murder of the king. The performs two feminine characters Gertrude and Ophelia can be likened to pawns on this intricate internet of lies and deceit, as their phrases and actions are dictated by the males of the play.

Don’t waste time Get a verified expert to help you with Essay


This can be instantly linked to the broader cultural

understandings of gender roles in sixteenth century England, as ladies were portrayed as passive, weak and submissive to the males power power aggression and action . As all texts position readers to interpret totally different characters in several ways, this text to may be learn as empowering the females, by showing to be submissive, in order to manipulate the boys.

However, as essentially Gertrude acts as a vehicle for Hamlets emotions, and Ophelia is primarily shaped to conform to exterior calls for to mirror the male characters needs, the role of the ladies in Hamlet is primarily that of a

manipulated pawn in a chess sport that not even the kings can win. The play ‘Hamlet’ begins with the funeral of the previous king of Denmark, that’s concurrently the wedding celebrations of the new king Claudius and his bride Gertrude, the younger Hamlet’s mother and former King’s spouse.

Hamlet’s suspicions that “something is rotten in the state of Denmark” are later confirmed by the ghost of his father, who reveals Claudius killed him, in a bid to gain power and his wife, Gertrude. Hamlet then decides that he should get revenge on Claudius and so pretends to be mad, fooling his mother, lover Ophelia and Claudius.

However, because of Hamlet’s procrastination, events take a flip for the worse as the end of the play brings about dying to each main character via error of judgment. Gender roles in the play Hhamlet are a vital factor dictating the lives of the females Ophelia and Gertrude. As robust masculinity was cherished, female traits were not fascinating in a man, and this explains the actions of Hamlet, who acts within the realm of female for the primary 4 acts. His fathers demise purchased about this lack of masculinity and Claudius additional strips him of this honor by saying, “of impious stubbornness.

Tis unmanly grief. ” (Act 1 sc. 2, 94 ) thus Hamlet is left weak and passive. He acknowledges this in his second soliloquy, ‘Oh what a rogue and peasant slave am I,” and he reveals his disgust at his female characteristics by loudly disapproving of Gertrude and Ophelia’s blatant sexuality. This is finest proven as he shouts at his lover Ophelia, “get thee to a nunnery,” to protect her purity and voice his disgust. Hamlet’s change of feeling in direction of Ophelia is a direct result of his dissatisfaction together with his personal quick comings, and Ophelia has no choice but to adapt to this change of attitude unquestionably.

Therefore Ophelia by way of no fault of her own is confronted with the very fact she has lost her lover, but also her respectability, as it’s well known she was not the innocent doyenne she is initially presumed to be, she is in the doghouse so to talk. Ophelia’s actions within the first a part of the play are decided by her brother Laertes and father Polonious to great extent, as they warn her to stave off Hamlet’s advances.

She states to her father, in response ‘my lord he hath importuned me with love in an honorable style,”(act 1 sc. 3)in such a means that may indicate she believes he genuinely loves her. Yet as he additional challenges she submits with out battle, “my lord I shall obey”(act 1 sc. 3) and is pressured into an informant function.

This lack of power of character is in preserving with typical gender roles of the era, and is additional evidence that whilst Ophelia feels in another way, she is perfectly willing to go along with regardless of the male figures in her life decide for her. As the play progresses we as readers gain the complete drive of the dependence Ophelia has on these characters, as their absence and later killing, drives

her into the madness from which she never recovers. This culminates in her untimely suicidal dying that sums up the purpose her role had in the play, to merely conform to the males needs and desires. She is Laertes ‘angel’, Polonious’s ‘commodity’ and Hamlets ‘spectre of his psychic fears’ . Ophelia could probably be referred to as an unstereotypical feminine in the play, as a end result of she does not play the harmless virgin function, and she or he goes mad after the demise of her father instead of quietly accepting it.

However this extra strongly displays the weaknesses of her character ,the absence of her inner power and divulges that she is just too simply overcome by emotion, traits which are extra prominently associated with females, especially within the sixteenth century. Thus Ophelia is dominated by the males in the play, as a outcome of her weaknesses that result in her demise, very like a pawn on a chess board.

Gertrude’s function in the play of ‘Hamlet’ is controversial, considering firstly her position of energy, that she has continued to carry despite her late husbands dying, as queen of Denmark. One would assume that Shakespeare, by inserting Gertrude in this highly respected position is empowering her and her authority, therefore shifting towards broader cultural assumptions of femininity.

This is definitely a chance, given the lengths Claudius went to so as to satiate his lustful desires, as with the romanticized story Helene of Troy. That Claudius the model new King would desire Gertrude as his wife, though she had already been married, had a son and was middle aged places Gertrude in one more place of energy, but did this empower her? After all, it is certain Claudius’s major ambition was to achieve the throne from his brother and so his marrying Gertrude offered, maybe not love, however for a simple transition that might not bring about much controversy. Either way, as with Ophelia she doesn’t take advantage of this power and is totally submissive to Claudius.

This is primarily because she allows herself to be manipulated. She is conscious of the approved role of girls and ascertains to it, as she states when watching the character reflective of herself in Hamlet’s play, ‘The woman protests to much, methinks’,(act three, sc. 2, 226) Claudius effectively makes use of her all through the play, most notably when he arranges along with her settlement, for Polonious to spy on a conversation she has with Hamlet.

This betrayal of trust to the son she loves demonstrates how simply she is led astray by persuasive males like Claudius and it’s a severe weak point in her character. Essentially her function consists of a pawn, not a queen, handed between two kings who dominate her and her actions. This weakness translates to her relations with her son Hamlet, upon whom she dotes, and that is seen by Claudius, ‘The queen his mother lives nearly by his looks. ‘(Act 4,Sc. 7,11-12)

That the norm of parental roles have virtually been reversed, with Gertrude wanting as much as her son and idolising him, while Hamlet seems down upon her provides him a superior position, from which he directs her actions. This happens most noticeably within the closet scene with Gertrude, as Hamlet shames his mother into helping him to persuade Claudius additional, that he is in reality mad, despite the precise fact prior, she conspired with Claudius over Hamlet.

Thus, this proves that she did not deliberately wish to hurt Hamlet by conspiring with the king to spy on him, within the earlier scene, however that she is so prepared to be led that she goes to comply with the instructions of whichever male instructs her. This closet scene also gives rise to the climax of Hamlet’s rage, but on this intense emotional scene, we as readers are given no indication as to Gertrude’s feeling.

It is in fact because her character is so adverse, insignificant and undeveloped that she arouses in Hamlet the feelings that she is incapable of representing. This interprets to her main function being that of a automobile for Hamlet’s emotions-thus she is once more manipulated and used as a pawn for Hamlet’s emotional state. Not only this, but Gertrude can be seen as the reason, a minimum of for Hamlet, for the tragedy. Gertrude’s guilt and Hamlet’s disgust at her, had to be maintained and emphasised in order to provide a physiological resolution for Hamlets actions.

As Hamlet shamelessly uses his mom to show he is mad, to level out his feelings and supply a reason for his anger it offers rise to the question, who the true villain is in Hamlet. Gertrude and Ophelia, while appeared down upon all through the play for being blatantly sexual and vulnerable to her passions and are thus blamed by Hamlet, are merely performing the role of pawns in a chess recreation, manipulated by the males. Each female appear only to satisfy the function of reflecting the males wishes as is in maintaining with the representations of femininity by Shakespeare.

Whilst readers may emerge initially from a reading of Hamlet with the impression that Hamlet is the misunderstood hero, with Ophelia and Gertrude taking half in the interfering adulterous ‘ugly stepsister’ role, another reading is feasible. That, through no fault of their own, the female’s submissive roles actually corrupted the males to such an extent that they, even Hamlet turned obsessive about the thought of power. So, although the females were manipulated by the males, it triggered the other effect by empowering them, as they ended up as the rationale for the males actions.

In conclusion, though controversial, it is evident that due to the position and function of the females within the play, Gertrude and Ophelia were used by the males to such a degree, that though the end end result would counsel in any other case, their role consisted of nothing more than pawns in a chessgame.

http://www2. students. sbc. edu/young02/hamlet. html ibid http://www. turksheadreview. com/library/introlit. html T. S. Eliot (1888-1965). The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. 1922.

Written by Essay Examples

Are the social Sciences Really Inferior?

Are We a Team?