Thesis Statement Overall, mandatory drug testing initiatives have noble intentions such as: providing medical care to the abuser, preventing lifelong dependency, and saving taxpayer dollars, however, states should choose to not implement the intrusive testing because it is unconstitutional, costly, and ultimately detrimental to the child, not the parents. Through this presentation you will..
• Learn about how widespread welfare usage is, and the history behind welfare reform.
• Understand why some legislators advocate for mandatory drug testing
• Look at the facts and realize that it is not only unconstitutional but also not an efficient means of spending allocated funds. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. Reasons Why Supporters Believe in Mandatory Drug Testing Overall good of youth dependents Zero tolerance policy Some buy drugs with welfare Tax payers have a right to know That their funds are spent well employed people must take drug tests Overall well being of invidual All reasoning lead to their overall stance, pro-testing. Reasons Why They Don’t Believe in Mandatory Drug Testing th amemmendment)
Unconstiutional (4 Cost Prohibitative Embarassing and untimely Potential false positives or false negatives This is why CPS etc. exists Kid gets punished; not the adult All reasoning lead to their overall stance, against testing. Florida Welfare Drug Testing Graphic- DO THE MATH. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. Conclusion Mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients is unconstitutional, because no just-cause to search and seize. We must trust that although it isn’t constitutional or affordable to drug test all people, other agencies are other there to protect the children, if abuse or neglect is occurring Correlation does not imply causation.
Amundson, Kalynn, Anna M. Zajicek, and Valerie H. Hunt. “Pathologies Of The Poor: What Do The War On Drugs And Welfare Reform Have In Common?.” Journal Of Sociology & Social Welfare 41.1 (2014): 5-28. Academic Search Premier. Web. 5 May 2014 Gupta, Vanita. “Should Welfare Recipients Be Tested For Drugs?.” U.S. News Digital Weekly 3.46 (2011): 14. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 May 2014.
Lyle, Lindsey. “Florida’s Legislation Mandating Suspicionless Drug Testing Of TANF Beneficiaries: The Constitutionality And Efficacy Of Implementing Drug Testing Requirements On The Welfare Population.” Tennessee Journal Of Law & Policy 8.(2012): 68-85. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 May 2014.
Rhodes, Tim, Sarah Bernays, and Kathrin Houmoller. “Parents Who Use Drugs: Accounting for Damage and Its Limitation.” Social Science & Medicine 71.8 (2010): 1489-497. Web. 6 May 2014. Vitter, David. “Should Welfare Recipients Be Tested For Drugs?.” U.S. News Digital Weekly 3.46 (2011): 14. Business Source Complete. Web. 6 May 2014.
Vitter, David. “Should Welfare Recipients Be Tested For Drugs?.” U.S. News Digital Weekly 3.46 (2011): 14. Business Source Complete. Web. 6 May 2014.
Wurman, Ilan. “Drug Testing Welfare Recipients As A Constitutional Condition.” Stanford Law Review 65.5 (2013): 1153-1193. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 May 2014.